

As Industrial Dispute between employer and employee is main concern in today’s scenario. Various authorities for the settlement of such dispute has been established under Industrial The main object of the Industrial Disputes Act is Investigation and settlement of Industrial Disputes. With that object in view various authorities have been created under the Act. The Act provides for the following authorities for the settlement of Industrial Disputes.

Conciliation is a method of discussions or negotiation through which the parties to the dispute voluntary reach amicable settlement acceptable to both the parties. The discussions and negotiations between the parties may be initiated by the parties themselves or with the efforts of third party neutral to the dispute. The third-party act like a mediator who mediates in and promotes the settlement of the dispute.
Parties to the dispute come to settlement voluntarily and not under any compulsion or coercion. Conciliation preserves amity and good relations between employer and the workmen as conciliation is an out of court settlement.
Authorities for the conciliation under Industrial Dispute Act 1947 — Authorities under the act
There are two conditions which must be satisfied before a work committee can be constituted–
Such number of persons , as thinks fit as conciliation officers
According to section 11(6) of the Act , a conciliation officer is deemed to be a public servant with the meaning of section 21 of Indian Penal code .
Provide such solution which is acceptable to both the parties. Rather than to determine the rights and wrongs of a problem.
Duties of Conciliation officer :
Section 12 deals with the duties of the conciliation officer :-
But where notice of strike and lock out is not given , the conciliation officer has discretion to decide whether or not to hold conciliation proceedings
Constitution – Section 5 empowers the appropriate government to constitute board of conciliation
Reference of Dispute –
Section 13 (1) imposes a duty on the board
It will be seen that where conciliation fails, Board of Conciliation takes over. The functions of the Board are the same as those of the conciliation officer. But there are certain differences between two which are as follows:
Constitution :
Method of adjudication settlement of an industrial dispute via adjudication by adjudication is a compulsory method of settlement of the dispute. The adjudicatory authority after hearing both the parties considering the merits of the dispute and material on record determines the rights and duties of the parties to the dispute and give its award.
The award of the adjudicatory authority is final and binding on the parties if it is not appealed against to the appellate authority by the aggrieved party, who is not satisfied with the award.
Industrial disputes act 1947 provides for the settlement of an industrial dispute by way of adjudication when the dispute is referred to adjudicatory authority by the appropriate government under section 10 of this act. The appropriate government has the power to refer the industrial dispute to the adjudicatory authority its discretion even if the parties to the dispute have not applied to the appropriate government for such reference.
Following are the authorities for adjudication under the industrial dispute Act 1947 :
Constitution
The central government may constitute in any state for the adjudication of matters.
A state government may constitute labour courts in its territories.
The functions of labour courts are —
The functions of the Labour Court are laid down in Section 7 of the said Act.
The Other matters assignable on the Labour Court are:
A limited jurisdiction has been made available to the Labour Court which is circumscribed by the Section itself and the matter enumerated in the second scheduled (E.g., Dismissal, Retrenchment, Strike, Lockout etc) Labour court is not a Tribunal within the meaning of section 7A(3)(b) read with Section 2(R) and hence not bound by the rules of evidence and natural justice as is the case with Industrial Tribunal.
A labour court shall consist of one person only to be appointed by appropriate government. Section 7 (3) lays down that a person shall not be qualified for appointment as the presiding officer unless
Section 7 A empowers the appropriate government to constitute one or more industrial tribunals-
However as per section 10 (1) — Dispute of third schedule which is not affecting more than 100 workmen such dispute can also be referred to labour court .
The Third Schedule —
The appropriate government may , if thinks fit , appoint two persons as assessors to advise the tribunal in the proceeding before it .
Constitution
Section 7 B provides for the constitution of national industrial tribunal.
The national tribunal shall consist of one person only to be appointed as its presiding officer of the national tribunal.
Disqualifications:
Section 7-C of the Industrial Dispute Act,1947 prescribes Disqualifications for the presiding officer to be appointed to the Labour Court, Industrial tribunal or National Industrial Tribunal. It provides that no person shall be appointed to or continue in office if:
Independent person has been defined in section 2(i) of the Act which says that a p[erson is said to be independent if if he is unconnected with the industrial dispute referred to such Board, labour Court or tribunal.
Under Section 8 of the industrial dispute Act,1947 the appropriate government is vested with the powers to fill up the vacancy in the Labor Court caused for any reason.
According to section 11 following are the power of adjudication authorities :
Every inquiry or investigation by the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal is deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code.
The jurisdiction of the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal and National:
Jurisdiction power of adjudicating authorities in dealing with industrial dispute referred to them is limited to Section 10(4), to the points specifically mentioned in the order of reference and the matter incidental thereto.
Section 10(4) reads as follows:
10(4). “Where in an order referring an industrial dispute to a Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal under Section 10(1) or in a subsequent order, the appropriate Government has specified the point of dispute for adjudication, the Labour Court or the Industrial Tribunal or the National Tribunal, as the case may be, shall confine its adjudication to those points and matters incidental thereto.”
Section 11-A states as follows:
11-A. “Where an industrial dispute relating to the discharge or dismissal of a workman has been referred to a Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal for adjudication and, in the course of adjudication proceedings, the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be, is satisfied that the order of discharge or dismissal was not justified, it may, by its award, set aside the order of discharge or dismissal and direct reinstatement of the workman on such terms and conditions, if any, as it thinks fit, or give- such other relief to the workman, including the award of any lesser punishment, in lieu of discharge or dismissal as the circumstances may require :
Provided that in any proceeding under this Section, the Labour Court, Industrial Tribunal or National Tribunal, as the case may be shall rely only on the material on the record and shall not take any fresh evidence in relation matter.”
In the case of G. Shahsi Kumar vs. Management of Indian Industries 1998 : By introducing Section 11-A, the Labour Court and the Industrial Tribunal have been empowered to interfere with the quantum of punishment if it is a he opinion that the punishment awarded was not proportionate to the act of misconduct and that the punishment awarded was not justified keeping in view the facts of the case.”
Punishment to be proportionate to the gravity of offence
Gujrat Ambuja Cement Pvt. Ltd. Vs. U.B. Gadhe : A workman may be dismissed from the services by the employer for grave misconduct committed by him and Labour Court or Industrial Tribunal cannot set aside such dismissal and reinstate the workman under Section 11-A Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 simply out of sympathy for the workman. In exercise of power under Section 11-A of I.D. Act, 1947, the Labour Court cannot interfere with the quantum of the punishment imposed by the employer unless punishment is shockingly disproportionate to the proved charges.
Arbitration is a method by which the parties to the dispute agree to refer voluntarily the dispute for settlement to a third neutral person known as arbitrator. The arbitrator, after hearing both the parties to the dispute, determines the rights and duties of the parties to the dispute by its award , which is binding on the parties.
Arbitration being an out of court, method of settlement of dispute is an inexpensive and speedy method of settlement of disputes.
And industrial disputes settle by arbitration under section 10 A of the Industrial Dispute act, 1947. The parties to an industrial dispute may refer an industrial dispute, voluntarily by a written agreement to an arbitrator under section 10 A of the act .
The object of section 10 A is to enable employers and employees to refer their dispute voluntarily to arbitration.
The Industrial Dispute Amendment Act 1982 has inserted new chapter IIB and section 9 -C in the Act for the setting up of grievance settlement authorities and reference of individual disputes to such authorities.
It has been made obligatory for an industrial establishment in which there are 50 or more workmen employed , to set up a time bound grievance redress procedure.
© VIDHOON All Rights Reserved